|
1) Give three examples from the article where people used information technology to prove the police did something bad.
The ubiquitous camera cell phone is becoming a powerful community tool in the debate about police conduct.
Some Los Angeles grassroots groups are training citizens to use cameras, video cell phones and Internet sites like YouTube to get their voices, and pictures, out to the public.
This police department was a cowboy department, a department that was very quick on the trigger, and it is hard to root out those practices from the past. That's why the cameras are important.
2) How is IT helping people solve the problem of police brutality?
Record all things that police done by camera, video. And find the brutal thing the police did.
3) Besides small, inexpensive cameras, what are some other technologies that people are using to expose abuses by the police?
Some cameras are very tiny. Can built on the wall. It can monitor the things the police did. But the police do not know this.
4) What does Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton say about using videos against police officers?
I cannot make judgments based solely on videos or portions of videos
5) Do you think this kind of technology is making the world a better place? Are there any ways that the same technologies that help the people in this article can also be harmful?
I do not think this is very good, the cameras will encroach on the privation about the police.
6) Will this kind of technology have any effect on Chinese society? Good or bad? Explain your answer.
Good .Because there are many corruptions in china.
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
ayahime's journal
